Hi,
I was wondering what the difference is between doing a double major in Physics and Astronomy , and doing a specialist in Astronomical Sciences is, as the course requirements are about the same… I plan on doing my Masters therefore would one have an advantage in any way over the other?
Thanks
———————————————
Hey hey
Okay so I gave the UTM calendar a once over and agree that the requirements all look more or less the same between a specialist in Astronomical Sciences and majors in Astronomy and Physics are more or less thre same. Now what’s the difference? Well, I’m going to go with basically just the pretty looking subject POSt(s) that will end up on your transcript.
Although that’s just coming from me. I suppose if you want a more sciencey contenty sounding response, you’re better off directing that question to the department? But even their names sound exactly the same…
Sheesh, that is confusing.
Now if your plan is to do a master’s, I personally recommend the specialist. It would probably look best since you’ll end up with a specialized grasp on x program rather than good grasps on a and b. I mean most post-grad programs are all about specializing in a particular field. Really though, look at the specific master’s programs you’re considering. Some schools can be picky!
But on another note, you can always do a minor?
Cheers!
aska
2 Comments
Yoav Margolis
Alcubierre Drive and Relativity
So, I read that NASA was in the process of developing a propulsion system that would allow for faster than light travel, by stretching space time, which would allow us to reach the Alpha Centauri system in 2 weeks. Since the spacecraft technically wouldn’t be moving [the space time around it would], would these 2 weeks be affected by relativity? Would it be 2 weeks on earth, or 2 weeks on the spaceship? Would their passage of time be the same or different? Thanks.
aska
42.