• fees

    WHEN WILL OUR FEES BE UP

    Hi! I can’t seem to find any concrete numbers anywhere – how much do courses cost for the per-course fee at St. George Arts & Sci? Is there a date when the fees are posted or are they already up somewhere I can’t see?

    ———————————————

    hey there,

    we’re hoping the fees for 2015-2016 will be posted around mid-July, so keep checking the fees website for updates as we approach that time. unfortunately, i can’t give you an exact date. (believe you me, i’m as bummed about that as you are.)

    however, you can take a look at the most recent archived fee schedule (for the moment, that’s 2013-2014 – they haven’t archived the 2014-2015 one yet) to get an approximate idea of what you’re looking at. that year, one half-course cost about $600, not including incidental fees.

    the archive is usually a pretty accurate representation of what to expect for the upcoming year, except the numbers are always a little bit bigger than they were in the preceding year. which is…just…nifty.

    cheers,

    aska

  • GPA

    *obsessively recalculates GPA the whole summer long*

    I finished first year and ended up with a 3.45 gpa- I know that’s not “bad” but I’m wondering how UofT calculates cgpa.. Do they just average all your annual gpas? More speciffically- (and hypothetically), if I get 4.0 in 2nd, 3rd, and 4th year, is the highest cpga I can achieve a 3.86?

    ———————————————

    hey there,

    technically, it’s “an average of all the courses you have taken,” but practically speaking, yes, that’s how it works out.

    HOWEVER, try not to stress too much about how you did in first year. nearly no graduate or professional schools take your first year into account for admissions decisions, so if that’s your worry, you can rest easy. everyone knows that first year is all about screwing up and falling on your face.

    just try to use what you learned in first year to make your second year even better than the first one. (not that you asked for my advice. or that your first year was at all bad. but, as my high school Latin teacher used to say, we must always be moving “onwards and upwards.”)

    cheers,

    aska

  • grad school,  physics

    even the physics WEBSITE is complicated

    Hi Aska! Under the physics major there is a note which says “The Physics Major program is not designed primarily for students intending to pursue graduate studies in Physics. Such students should consider the Physics Specialist or one of the joint Specialist programs.” and I was just wondering if doing a physics major rather than a specialist would impact my chances of getting into grad school? And why is this the only major I’ve come across which states this? Thanks!

    ———————————————

    hey there,

    obviously, there are lots of physics graduate programs at many universities across the world. i can’t analyze how appropriate uoft’s major program might be for every one of them, so i’m just going to use uoft’s M.Sc. in Physics program as an example – even though their website is BASICALLY USELESS.

    the only thing the whole physics site really has to say about admission requirements for the M.Sc. program is this: “A B+ or better average in an honours physics program or a program of comparable rigour in a closely related field.

    despite the fact that there is not nearly enough information in this sentence, it’s also a very confusing sentence. and the confusion starts with the word “honours.”

    most people outside uoft – hell, most peopl inside uoft – have no idea what the word “honours” actually means. so strap yourself in and get ready for a crash course in uoft history.

    before 1992, uoft offered two bachelor’s degrees: a three-year degree, and a four-year honours degree (see “Discontinued Degrees and Upgrading“). not everyone did the honours degree. it was only for the super-special smart cookies of the university. everyone else moved to the suburbs to get their 2.5 kids and white picket fence, or whatever it is they did back then.

    nowadays, there is no more three-year degree. everyone’s degree is four years long (unless you started before 1992 OR you’re graduating with a GPA under 1.85), which means everyone gets an honours degree. no one is special anymore.

    so that’s what “honours” REALLY means. however, i have a feeling that that’s not what the physics department means by the word “honours.” i’m thinking they’re probably using it in the traditional sense, to mean a more specialized or intensive degree, like in the pre-1992 days of yore. and the reason i think this is because they say “honours physics program.” not degree, program.

    AND NOW we FINALLY get to the point: given their probable use of the word “honours,” a major program from uoft in physics, requiring as it does only 7.5 physics FCEs, is probably not rigorous enough as preparation for a master’s program. if you think about it, 7.5 FCEs is less than half of your degree, and so it might not be enough preparation for a graduate program dedicated entirely to physics.

    the specialist programs, meanwhile, require nearly double that amount of credits. they also provide more opportunities for academic research, which is invaluable for someone preparing for a graduate degree. finally, in the natural sciences (as opposed to the humanities or social sciences), there tends to be a more marked difference between majors and specialists. specialists not only require more courses, they tend to require different and more rigorous courses as well.

    of course, not all graduate programs will require this level of preparation. if you’re interested in a graduate program other than physics, or at another university, their requirements may differ, and i would urge you to research those so you have a better idea of what they’re looking for.

    i’d also highly recommend you consult with professors or administrators from the program you’re interested in. however, GENERALLY SPEAKING, natural science graduate programs tend to require or prefer what they would call an “honours” program; that is, a specialist.

    cheers,

    aska

  • courses

    where the profs at??

    Hi!

    So i want to enroll in a class (rlg369) for which i don’t have the prerequisites. Normally this wouldn’t be allowed but i feel like i have sufficient prior knowledge of the subject matter to do well in the class without the prereqs. (rlg205). I’ve emailed a couple people to ask for special permission but no one has replied and its been months. I was just wondering what more ishould be doing and just who i should be talking to.

    Thanks

    ———————————————

    hey there,

    you’ve done everything right, my friend. departments are super sketchy to contact in the summer because half the profs are away conducting research in antarctica and naples and other places i’d much rather be than here (honestly, there’s only so many times i can go to the fox and the fiddle before developing some serious trauma related to honey garlic wings). however, there’s not much you can do but wait.

    since a couple of months have gone by, i’m sure your message just got lost in the endless barrage of e-mails the department gets (it happens to the best of us). you may want to send them a follow-up e-mail.

    if you’re close enough to campus, you could even drop by the department during business hours (there’s also a number you can call). there’s bound to be someone there. even if they can’t answer your question, they may forward your request to the person who can.

    good luck,

    aska

  • breadth requirements,  seminars

    disappointed in the course calendar, @ uoft

    Hi there,

    The timetable indicates that First Year Seminar *Nomos Basileus (‘Law the King’): The Idea of Law in Ancient Greek Thought* falls under Breadth category #2 and the course description puts it in Breadth category #1 so wondering which one is it for real.

    Thanks for your help!

    ———————————————

    hey there,

    i called up the lovely lovely people at classics and it is, in fact, a breadth 2 course.

    shout out to the guy at the department who was majorly disappointed to learn that they made a mistake when he JUST CHECKED to make sure it was all correct like two days ago. we appreciate all your hard work, my man.

    greek statue

    the ancient Greeks, shown here looking at the course calendar

    cheers,

    aska

  • grad school

    working socially

    Hi,

    I’m in my second year but I just switched to a sociology major and I hope to get into the UofT Masters of Social Work program after my undergrad. The sociology program requirements are SOC200H1 and SOC202H1. In summer school, I’m taking? SOC200H1 and SOC202H1. Would I be able to NCR SOC202, or no because its a program requirement?

    Also, M.S.W admissions requirements say that candidates for admission to the Two-Year M.S.W. Full-Time Program shall have achieved at least a mid-B or better in the final year of full-time study or equivalent, in senior level courses (300 or 400 level). Does this mean that they will only look at the courses I take in fourth year, whether they be 300 or 400 level? Or will they also look at courses that I have taken in 3rd year? If I dont take a full course load in fourth year will they look at my 3rd year marks? And it says that I need a half-credit course in research methodology as well- do SOCC200 and SOC202 count as research methodology courses?

    Thank you.

    ???????????????

    hey there,

    you CAN’T cr/ncr any course that’s a program requirement, so you best leave SOC202 alone if you want it to count towards your sociology major.

    the only reason we could cr/ncr program requirements?last semester is because of the?awful fever dream that was the T.A. strike; but now we’re?back to normal, kids. back to the absolute delight that is taking courses in the summer. yay.

    as for your second question, the wording there seems intentionally ambiguous to me.

    i’m going to GUESS that they said it that way so that they have a bit of wiggle room. ’cause on?the one hand, it seems to mean pretty clearly that if you took any 100- or 200-level courses in your last year, they won’t consider those; they’ll only look at the senior courses you took in?your last year.

    but i ALSO?have the feeling?that if you didn’t take enough?300- and 400-level courses in your fourth year, they might resort to your third year to get a better idea of your academic performance. keep in mind that students applying in their fourth year haven’t completed all their fourth year courses yet, so admissions committees?may have no choice but to use their third year in making an initial admission decision.

    tl;dr: whatever 300- or 400-level courses you take are likely fair game for consideration. if you don’t take many in fourth year, then they may look at the ones in 3rd year.?this is something you’re more than free to ask someone at the faculty, by the way. they don’t have to answer, but you also have every right to ask.

    if you’re considering not being full time (that’s less than 3.0 credits) in your final year, i would recommend talking to someone at factor-inwentash about how that might affect your application.

    and i’m almost positive soc200 and 202 count as research methodology courses.

    good luck with your application. i know you’ll do great. hope it’s not too gruelling.

    ttfn,

    aska