• admissions,  prereqs,  rotman

    i’m an ap calculus hater

    So I recently got accepted into UofT into their Rotman Commerce Program. The thing is, this was stated in my terms and conditions (conditional offer):”Maintain your current academic standing, particularly in any prerequisite subjects for the admission category to which you have been admitted, and graduate. If you have already completed your studies, ensure your official results are submitted.” Does this mean I have to submit my AP Calc results?


    hey there,

    huge congrats on your acceptance to rotman!!! conditional or not, that is a big deal and i hope you are being celebrated. if not, this is me celebrating you. YIPPEEE!!! YAYYY!! YAHOOO!!!

    ok party’s over. now to your question.

    hmm, AP calculus is not necessarily a pre-requisite for rotman admissions. but i know that calculus & vectors (MCV4U) or an equivalent course is required. so i’d say..

    1. if you took a different grade 12 level calculus course, you probably don’t need to submit your AP calc results.
    2. if AP calc was how you fulfilled the calculus & vectors (MCV4U) requirement, you should submit your AP calc results.

    if this was any other AP course, i’d say either way, you should probably just submit your AP scores for the sake of getting a transfer credit. i remember having to do this manually — ie. the AP college board will not just automatically send your scores to your university.

    basically, once your scores are available in early july, you just go to the AP website and submit them using U of T’s code, 0982. as long as you submit by the end of august, you’d automatically have a transfer credit show up in your transcript, assuming your AP exam mark is at least a 4.

    BUT, the thing about U of T is that they don’t actually accept AP calc for transfer credits. (this made me soooo mad in grade 12.)

    Story pin image

    so if you were to submit your AP calc marks, it would only be to show them your final grade.

    anyways. in short, i’d recommend you should definitely submit your AP calc marks if that was your fulfilment of the MCV4U requirement. however, if you fulfilled the requirement with another calc course, you still could  submit the AP calc scores, because AP calc is technically a course that will show up on your grade 12 transcript and U of T might want to know your final score.

    regardless of whether it’s a required pre-requisite for you or not, i don’t think it hurts to submit your AP calc scores to U of T.

    finally, just to preface!! i am just a student, not an admissions officer. so as much as i hate to admit it, there is a chance what i’m telling you is not completely accurate. if you want an answer that is 100% true, i’d suggest checking out some of the contacts on this page. or, email the rotman registrar at ro@rotman.utoronto.ca. i don’t wanna lead you astray 🙁

    good luck with everything!

    This may contain: a ferret wearing a colorful hat and saying please don't ever speak to me about math i've moved on

    over and out,

    aska

  • digital enterprise management,  UTM

    hit dem hard

    Hello I wanted to ask few questions

    I applied for Management but unfortunately couldn’t get into it but however DEM was my alternative choice and I got acceptance in that but they say that major can only be declared after first year of studies. But the problem is that DEM is type 3 degree and I don’t have any third choice so I just want to be sure that I will not be denied entry into it after completing the prerequisite courses and minimum grade requirement.

    My programme is at UOFT Mississauga Campus .

    Thank you


    hey there,

    aw i’m sorry to hear that you didn’t get into your first choice! that can really suck.

    this is also such a valid concern. if you didn’t get into management and are now settling for your second choice, i totally understand why you want to be sure you’ll get in this time around!

    here are some of my thoughts.

    first, you’ve got it right that at U of T, program enrolment happens after your first year of studies. as you can see on this page, you need to have completed at least 4.0 credits to get into a program. (for context: one half-year course is 0.5 credits. so you can complete 4.0 credits by taking, for example, 4 courses in the fall and 4 courses in the winter.)

    second, the info you have about DEM is correct. DEM is a type 3 program, which means

    1. you have to apply
    2. you have to meet the program requirements, and
    3. there are limited spots available

    that third point makes things a bit harder. the fact that there are limited spots available means that even if you meet all the program requirements, there’s a chance you won’t get in — but, don’t panic yet! this is just what i’ve heard from word of mouth, and it generally only applies if there’s a lot of interest during a certain year. if there’s too much competition, the people who are just on the edge of meeting the grade minimums may not get in. (eg. if the minimum is 70, your grade is 70 or 71.)

    so if you wanna play it really safe, what i would recommend is that you try your best to exceed the minimum grades by as much as you can.

    if you take a look at the digital enterprise management page on the academic calendar, you’ll be able to see exactly what the minimum grades for your program are. this page says you’ll need to have completed the following courses…

    1. CCT109H5 (with a minimum grade of 70%);
    2. CCT110H5 (with a minimum grade of 70%); and
    3. CCT112H5 (with a minimum grade of 70%)

    but on top of this, you’ll also need to meet a minimum cGPA. the thing is, they say the minimum cGPA changes every year based on competition and interest.

    so if you asked for my personal opinion on how to ensure your admission into the DEM program, it’s this:  really try your best to not only meet, but exceed the minimum grades in the three required courses. and, try to keep your overall GPA as high as you can.

    like, don’t get me wrong. you definitely don’t have to drive yourself insane trying to get perfect marks. but, i just want you to be aware that simply meeting the mark of 70 will probably not guarantee you admission into the program. in fact, U of T loves to say that meeting the minimum grades doesn’t guarantee you a spot. so in response, i say aim for a higher mark than you think you’ll need. but also, through it all please remember to be gentle and kind with yourself!

    and finally, i’d recommend that you apply during the first program request period. 

    as you can see on this page, there are 2 program request periods. while the current dates shown are still specific to 2025, they should update in the fall to 2026 dates. but in general, the first request period opens in early march and closes in late april. that’s when you should apply.

    i recommend this because applying during the first round gives you two chances to get into your program! if you apply during march-april round, you’ll hear back with an acceptance/rejection in may. and if you’re rejected, this gives you enough time to apply again during the second request period in june-august! yay.

    anyways, just keep in mind that CR/NCR courses won’t count towards the 4.0 credits required to get into a program. in simple terms, CR/NCR is basically for when you want to avoid having a low mark affect your transcript, so you can request for it to show a pass/fail instead. so if you choose to do this to a course, make sure you’ll still finish first year with at least 4.0 credits in other courses.

    sooo yeah! i hope this was helpful. i hope you hit all those requirements and hit dem hard.

    ha.. ha..

    Story pin image

    over and out,

    aska

  • admissions,  engineering,  scholarships/bursaries

    yess internet, give us nothing!

    hi aska! i’m a gr 12 student accepted to utsg engineering, and i searched for engineering admission scholarships requiring applications on the uoft award explorer. when i clicked apply, some of the application links (like for the Albert and Rose Jong Entrance Scholarship) lead to this page saying: ‘The University Registrar’s Office is making changes to the process for 2023-24. Updates will be available shortly. Stay tuned!’ do you know how/if i can apply for them? thank you!


    hey there,

    that is weird. but, also unsurprising. i see this happen way too often with U of T websites. in fact, i encountered the same problem last year when i was looking for scholarships in my program.

    and ok i see what you mean. i just went to the award explorer and it led me to that same out-of-date page you saw!

    This may contain: a pink and red background with the words a few moments later

    well, i spent over an hour searching for answers to your question and i hope you’re hungry, cause i came up with…

    This may contain: a man holding a plate with a light on it

    a whole bunch of nothing! 😀

    i could not for the life of me find a working application link to those awards. which is weird, because if they’re listed on the award explorer, i’m pretty sure you should be able to apply to them….

    so even if i can’t figure out the exact answers to your questions, i will not leave you starving. here’s my advice on where to go from here:

    honestly, if the “apply” link keeps leading to this out-of-date page, i would just recommend that you directly email the faculty offering the award and ask about whether you’re able to apply. tell them the same thing you told me. tell them that the links aren’t working, and specify that you’re interested in engineering admission scholarships requiring applications.

    in general, if you have questions about a scholarship that can’t be answered on the info page, don’t be afraid to reach out directly to the faculty offering the scholarship.

    that’s exactly what i did last year when i couldn’t figure out how to apply to some scholarships — i just went directly to the people in charge. and they got back to me within a week and very kindly answered all my questions!

    so if you balk at hearing “email them” like i do, let me tell you, do not be scared. it’s actually so very chill! and if you ask me, it’s the faculty’s job to make its award application process clear for applicants. if students can’t find their award applications in an accessible or easy way, that’s on them.

    but exactly who should you contact, you ask?

    well, i can see that engineering admissions award links offered by both the university’s registrar office and the faculty of engineering are leading to that same page. so i guess you could contact either of them. but, honestly i’ve never tried contacting the university’s registrar office so i’m not sure how fast their response time would be. they’re the main office for the whole university, and they might receive a higher volume of emails than other registrar offices.

    so what i’d recommend you do is contact the engineering registrar, since you might have a better chance of them getting back to you quickly. plus, now that you’ve been admitted, you are one of the students that they are in charge of helping!

    here is the link to the emails and contact information of people in the faculty of engineering. don’t worry, i know there are a whole lot of people and emails on that page — so to help you narrow it down, the emails i’d recommend you contact are either the “awards and honors” person, or the undergrad admissions email: admissions@engineering.utoronto.ca , or the main registrar email: registrar@engineering.utoronto.ca .

    and yeah, i hope this somewhat helps? sorry i couldn’t give you a better answer :((( the internet fails me sometimes.

    This may contain: the young man is sitting in front of his laptop and holding his hand to his face

    over and out,

    aska

  • admissions,  Transferring,  UTSC

    who plants flowers in a sandbox

    First year uni transfer student here. I was curious what UTSC actually cares about when looking at transfer students? Is it the cgpa (x/4) or my last years average (xx%)? Also I was just curious what the status update from “application under review” to “application under review by faculty/division” meant… is there even a difference or have my hopes been squandered like a flower in a child’s sandbox?.

    P.s. thank you aska!!!


    hey there,

    thank you for the thank you!

    so no, i don’t think your hopes have been squandered like a flower in a child’s sandbox, though i rock with the way you put that. i think your hopes still have a chance at life! don’t you dare let anyone kill them.

    Story pin image

    in fact, let me pull out my nonexistent CPR skills and revive them, right here, right now.

    because there is still hope for your application. the status update from “application under review” to “application under review by faculty/division” basically means that your application is moving through the system. so now, it’s under review by the faculty you applied for — and that is good news! yippee.

    but what does UTSC look for when reviewing your application?

    officially, they say here that they look at your complete academic record, with more emphasis on your most recent year of full-time study. they also say they look at both your academic and non-academic credentials, depending on your program.

    but honestly i’m not sure if they look at your cgpa or your percent average. i’d say it’s safer to assume that they’ll look at both? all they actually tell us is that they look at your complete academic record — there’s nothing i can find that gets more specific than that.

    beyond that, they will likely look closest at relevant subjects for the program you’re applying for. this might mean they even look at some of your high school marks, if you didn’t take anything on the subject in uni. for example, if you applied to statistics, they would probably pay the most attention to any calculus and functions courses that you’ve taken, whether that be in high school or first year university.

    finally if you’re worried because you’re still waiting to hear a response right now, just know that the people reviewing your application might still be waiting to receive your final marks from this past uni semester. the semester did just end, and not everyone’s marks are out yet.

    so not all hope is lost! according to this page, decision letters go out from january to may, and the month of may is not over yet.

    anyways, good luck with everything, my friend. hope you enjoyed my live demonstration of CPR.

    This may contain: an image of a cartoon character with hearts coming out of his heart shaped body and the words skiddadle skidoodle u have my love & support

    over and out,

    aska

  • housing,  money,  residence

    the housing market should be scared of me

    Hi there!!!!!!! Is it actually cheaper to rent an apartment than to live in college? Those prices are driving me insane, honestly lol.


    hey there,

    This may contain: a hand that is sticking out of a cone

    this is a great question.

    my immediate answer is yes, it is cheaper live off campus, just because that’s how it’s been in my experience and my friends’ experiences.

    for example, some of my friends were recently paying around $1600/person/month to live on campus and then moved off campus to a place that was like $1300 per person each month.

    personally, i used to live in dorm but got an apartment last fall. let’s just say that when i moved off-campus, my rent was $500 less per month than it would have been had i stayed in campus housing. but keep in mind, i got really lucky finding my place.

    so if you’re exclusively looking at the renting price itself, in general it is common to find apartments within walkable distance from campus that are cheaper than the college dorms (see a list of the dorm prices here).

    but for a complete answer, i have to acknowledge that whether an apartment is “cheaper” heavily depends on your lifestyle choices — ie. what conditions you’re willing to live in, how far you’re willing to commute, how much you’re ordering food in. because there are definitely ways to make living off-campus more expensive than dorm.

    furnishings

    an important thing to consider is how much it’s going to cost to furnish your apartment. some apartments come furnished, most don’t. you’ll want to think about how long you’re planning to stay in the city — is it worth buying all this furniture if you’re only here for a few years? you decide.

    if you stay in dorm, you save a few hundred, maybe more, on furnishings and cleaning supplies. but if you’re here for a while, this one-time purchase might be worth it.

    maybe you’ll even get lucky and manage to find a furnished place! like, my friends just found a relatively affordable place with really nice furnishings nearish to campus. it’s doable.

    meanwhile, if you were wondering, it is also possible to furnish on a budget.

    for example, i was able to cut costs by turning to my holy grail facebook marketplace for things like shelves or chairs. you can also ask around — a lot of students are moving in and out, and everyone has things they want to get rid of. if you’re feeling adventurous, you might take note that most of my furnishings were picked up from the sidewalks of residential neighbourhoods and then thoroughly bleached. what can i say? you see an offering from the universe, you take it.

    food

    this is a huge factor that can make-or-break how expensive your living is. my biggest qualm with U of T dorms is that almost all of them require you to buy a meal plan if you want to live in dorm. bully behavior if you ask me. *cough* whaat who said that?

    This may contain: a man sitting at a table with a drink in his hand

    i’ve never had to buy a meal plan, but i remember in my first year everyone was trying to use up their money before the school year ended. one kid had 2000$ he had to use up in one month — so he treated the entire class to lunch multiple weeks in a row LOL.

    the short story is, you’re going to be paying an insane amount of money for the meal plan. even if you don’t use up all the money in it, you won’t get it back. and there’s pretty much no way you’re going to use up all the money by yourself.

    so to save money, i would recommend living in a place with a kitchen — whether that be a dorm or an apartment. for example, woodsworth college and innis college both include kitchens in their dorms, and give you the option to avoid meal plans.

    just try not to live exclusively off uber eats like some students do. then consider all that money Not Saved 😀

    area

    next up, what area are you looking at? an important thing you’ll want to consider how far you’re willing to walk to get to class. are you willing to pay transit fare multiple times a week? because with frequent use, transit fares can add up to a lot of money.

    in general, apartments further from campus are going to be a lot cheaper. for example, places in little italy will be more affordable than, say, places in the annex. but, while you’re deciding how far you’re willing to walk, just keep in mind that toronto turns into a windy winter hellscape for most of the school year.

    *not actual footage of toronto. i am just being dramatic*

    ultimately there’s a lot of factors to consider here. living farther is technically cheaper but if you consider the transit cost idk…

    and even if you live close to campus, the area north-east of campus has very few affordable grocery stores while the south-west side is affordable grocery heaven. definitely some things to think about.

    more affordable on-campus housing options

    all that considered, i just want to make sure you know that living in an expensive college dorm is not the only option if you want to live on campus.

    here are some options that people i personally know have used. these are like, not necessarily U of T affiliated, but are still university student residences:

    coop housing. this is the most affordable option you’re gonna get! it involves living right on the edge of campus with around 9-13 people in a house, and from what i can see, rent is around 600-800$ per month. this is the lowest rent i’ve ever seen downtown. so if coop housing peaks your interest, you might want to spend some time scrolling through the coop house options, as there are many different houses with different rent prices.

    tartu residence is the second most affordable place i know of. it is also located on the edge of campus, on bloor street. the lowest monthly rent you can pay here is $785, but there are a lot of pricing options here depending on what conditions you prefer. i know different people who have rented at the lowest and highest rates at tartu, and both sides say it worked well for them.

    anywayssss. the good thing is that the housing market has gone down a bit this year so it is actually a good time to be looking for an apartment (in comparison to recent years, where it’s been really bad).

    so yeah, i hope this was helpful and not too confusing? remember, this is just my personal opinion gained from a few years in the city — i guess you could say other people might have different opinions. i guess.

    This may contain: a woman standing in a kitchen next to blue cupboards with the words everyone should listen to me all the time about everything

    feel free to ask more questions, like how to look for apartments or area recommendations. i have sooo much to say about this but don’t want to overload you with info lol. good luck with everything!

    over and out,

    aska

  • admissions,  hard

    the waiting game

    I’ve completed my application in January and I have received multiple emails from uoft admissions (probably more than 40 emails have been sent back-and-forth between us), yet I have not been admitted and it is now April and I already understand why people called the school uoftears. I already have hair loss before even entering the school.
    Like bro if you’re gonna reject me just say it already.
    No need to ghost me to make me like you more or smth.
    Also if you’re in the admission team and you see this please let me in.


    hey there,

    dangg i’m sorry that’s happening!! i know this season is already such a hard time for high school applicants, and what you described sounds so stressful 🙁

    i hate to let a homie down, but i’m not actually working on the admissions team. i’m just a student! (albeit a super duper cool one who knows a lot of things about the university). so even if i wanted to, i can’t let you in. (unless i went rogue, became a supervillain and hacked the system idk).

    but while i don’t have the super-hacking powers to let you in myself, i can tell you some things that might help ease the uncertainty.

    based on what you’ve said it seems to me like there is good news: and it’s that you haven’t been rejected. U of T will clearly and formally tell you if you have been rejected, so if you haven’t received a rejection letter, there is still hope for you to get in. U of T will not just ghost you.

    i also know that acceptance/rejection letters are still going out right now, and can even come out as far as in late may, according to this future U of T page. in fact, admission decisions can be sent out late for any number of reasons. for example, depending on your program, they might just be reviewing supplemental information, or even waiting for relevant midterm/interim grades to come out.

    the point is, decisions are still being made right now, and you can still be considered in the next round of admission decisions.

    however, i know that waiting this long for your admission decision can be quite stressful and hard. just know that your worth is not tied to the university’s timeline or decision! and in the meantime, please be kind to yourself. you’ve already done the hard work, now we’ve just got to sit tight and wait.

    Story pin image

    wishing you good vibes, good luck, and sunshine-filled mornings. you’ve got this!

    over and out,

    aska

  • choosing,  courses,  one programs,  timetable

    feeling attacked by course enrolment is a rite of passage

    hi aska,i just accepted my utsg offer and am already stressed about the course selection process. i tried using the timetable builder but i don’t understand it 🙁 do i select all the tutorials and lectures listed for a specific course? what does this mean?: “Students enrolled in LEC0101, LEC2000 & LEC2001, must enroll in one of TUT0101 to TUT1702; TUT2801; or TUT5101 to TUT5201.” do i take all vic one courses? is it okay if most of the courses i want to take are 0.5 credits?thank you in advance!


    hey there,

    big congrats to you and welcome!

    first, i gotta say, the immediate stress and confusion about course enrolment is absolutely normal. when i was in your shoes and dealing with this for the first time, i remember going crazy over how confusing everything was — it always felt like i was missing something important that everyone else heard about!

    but the good thing is that course enrolment does make more sense once you’ve done it a bunch of times. so maybe i can help clear some things up.

    enrolling in LEC and TUT

    so you’re asking what this means on the timetable builder: “students enrolled in LEC0101, LEC2000 & LEC2001, must enrol in one of TUT0101 to TUT1702; TUT2801; or TUT5101 to TUT5201.”

    great question! i am realizing that wording is so confusing?! not very swag of them :(. it’s interesting because i’ve never seen instructions like this for course enrolment… usually it’s simple and you just enrol in one lecture and one tutorial. but — uhhh i’ve actually never had to enrol in a course like this before.

    *i leave you in the room and do some digging through the world wide web*

    This may contain: an animated cartoon character standing in front of a blue background

    *i return looking more confused*

    This may contain: an animated cartoon character holding something in his hand

    okayyyy so i’m gonna guess that the course you’re asking about is SOC100? because the only place those exact instructions can be found on the internet is in the SOC100 syllabus from fall 2023. but when i look at the timetable builder for fall 2025, the SOC100 tutorial and lecture numbers look a bit different, so those instructions wouldn’t apply anymore. in general, just know that you should ignore the enrolment instructions of past syllabuses, since they change every year.

    for now, it’s too unclear since the timetable builder doesn’t have all the enrolment instructions or details up for fall/winter yet. once more details show up on the timetable builder and you’re able to start adding courses to your enrolment cart on acorn, things will hopefully make more sense.

    but if you still wanted to know, i can tell you what i think those instructions mean. i think if you’re enrolled in one of the three lectures, you must choose one tutorial in one of the three ranges — so one tutorial overall. either:

    1. a tutorial between the numbers TUT0101 and TUT1702

    2. just TUT2801

    3. a tutorial between the numbers TUT5101 and TUT5201

    so in the end, you could be enrolled in LEC0101 and TUT0101, for example. and if you wanted to know what’s behind my reasoning for that, it’s just based on familiarity with how U of T writes their lists of options. see more on that here.

    ultimately, it’s kinda really hard to give an exact answer on this unless i knew exactly what the course code was so that i could take a look at how it looks on acorn myself. but anyways, if i’m wrong about the SOC100 syllabus thing… haha ignore that you didn’t hear me. if i’m right about it… of course i’m right.

    This may contain: a man sitting at a table with his hand on his chin and pointing to the side

    what are lectures and tutorials

    i get that all this course code stuff can be confusing if no one’s explained it before. so i do want to quickly go over what lectures and tutorials are.

    basically, just think of “lecture” as the main class time. here, your professor teaches you things, uses a laser pointer at a powerpoint slide, and yaps away while you rapidly type notes at the speed of light. every single course will have a lecture, noted as “LEC” on the timetable builder.

    some courses will also have “tutorials”, noted as “TUT” on the timetable builder. here, you listen to your TA (teaching assistant) yap away instead, and depending on your program, they’ll either go over problems or go over the readings, and you’ll do a lot of class discussion stuff.

    tutorials are almost always offered in larger courses (think more than 80 people), but can also be used in classes as small as 50. the main idea of tutorials is to break up the crowd and give you the chance to learn in smaller groups.

    like for example, if you’re in a class of 200, and there’s only one prof, how would the prof answer all 200 student’s questions during class time? that would waste a lot of time and make the prof go a little insane. so instead, we get broken up into groups of say, 20, to get the chance to ask specific questions, get one-on-one help, and engage in discussion about course content with other students.

    so tutorials are more similar to the high school classroom experience. and keep in mind that you’re often required to attend them — especially if you have participation marks or presentation projects involved.

    vic one courses

    do you have to take all vic one courses?

    hmmmmm. so i’m gonna assume that you’ve already applied and been accepted to the vic one program. because in order to take vic one courses, you would need to get into the program first. like, it’s a whole separate application to the U of T application. but you know that, right? 😀

    once you’re in, you would know that there are eight streams, and you would have chosen your stream during the application. here’s the catch, though: you can only take courses within the stream you got into. so for example, if you got into the chambers stream, you won’t be able to take courses from the pearson stream, gooch stream, or any of the other streams.

    but, the good thing is that while taking vic one courses, you are allowed to take courses offered at other colleges. it says so on their FAQ page. so in short, no, you are not limited to only vic one courses.

    in fact, you can’t actually take only vic one courses during your first year. you’re gonna have to take other courses too, because vic one courses alone can’t fill up your course schedule.

    why is that?

    well, if you take a look at the vic one course offerings on the timetable builder, you’ll see that some streams offer two fall 0.5 courses and two winter 0.5 courses, while other streams offer two 1.0 courses.

    adding up either of these options would leave you with 2.0 credits completed by the end of the year. BUT to finish first year, you’re going to have to take at least 4.0 credits.

    so you’ll have to take courses outside of vic one to meet your degree requirements. does that make sense?

    finally, if you didn’t actually apply to vic one yet but wanted to join it, you’ve still got a chance! the third application round is still open until june 9, and you can find out more about applying here.

    half credit courses

    yes, it is absolutely fine if most or even all the courses you want to take are 0.5 credits. these courses are worth half a credit, and are more common than courses that are worth one full credit.

    half-credit courses will last for one semester, which is half of the school year. for example, it can start in september and end in december, OR start in january and end in april. meanwhile, full-credit courses will last for the whole school year, from september to april.

    anyways, these were all really great and very valid questions. i’m glad you asked rather than languishing in confusion! that’s not fun, i would know.

    This may contain: a tortoise sitting on top of a red carpet next to a microphone

    so i hope this was helpful, feel free to ask again if more come up!

    over and out,

    aska